ACOUSTIC
EMISSION & NDT SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
Pressure Vessel Evaluation With Pattern Recognition Acoustic
Emission Data Analysis
Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on
Acoustic Emission Testing - EWGAE 2002, September 11 – 13, 2002,
Prague, Czech Republic, Editor: P. Mazal, ISBN 80-214-2174-6,
Volume I, pp. 29-36
A.
A. Anastassopoulos, A. N. Tsimogiannis, D. A. Kouroussis
Acoustic Emission (AE)
has been successfully applied for the structural integrity
assessment of metallic pressure vessels, during both in-service
tests and hydraulic testing. The extensive testing of such vessels
has led to the development of AE proof testing procedures,
evaluation criteria and international standards. In addition to that
industry proved procedures such as MONPAC, extended the pass/fail
evaluation of the codes to quantitative evaluation of fault severity
and criticality and have provided the industry with a tool for 100%
evaluation of the vessel, capable of giving early warning of
developing defects, increasing, thus, the operational safety.
It might often be the
case in such AE tests that complex AE signatures are present, i.e.
multiple AE sources emitting simultaneously, such as propagating
flaws, external mechanical noise (wind gusts, impacts, friction,
nearby works etc.), turbulent noise from the filling point of the
vessel, EMI, etc. In such cases, noise-related sources have to be
effectively discriminated and filtered out because they might lead
to non-relevant indications. Consequently, the analysis of the AE
data is not always straightforward. The
ever-increasing demand for an analysis tool for the characterization
and understanding of the recorded AE sources has led to the
development of methodologies for the mathematical classification of
the corresponding AE data. In this context, Unsupervised Pattern
Recognition (UPR) has recently been applied to AE data obtained
during testing of pressure vessels such as spheres and bullets. The
present paper outlines the basic features of Unsupervised Pattern
Recognition for AE data and reports on some successful application
examples of the technique, with the use of specialized Pattern
Recognition software. It is shown that, upon proper selection of the
UPR algorithms and parameters, the technique can successfully
identify and separate noise-related AE (EMI, friction, mechanical
impacts, hydraulic noise, leak) from legitimate AE and assist in
signal characterization. Furthermore, Supervised Pattern
Recognitions algorithms can be trained to automatically segregate
the data of any similar AE test. It is concluded that further work
will lead to the automation of the analysis procedure and to more
effective and confident assessment of the structural integrity of
the tested vessels.